“Natasha Bertrand should be FIRED from CNN! I watched her for three days doing Fake News. She should be IMMEDIATELY reprimanded, and then thrown out like a dog. She lied on the Laptop from Hell Story, and now she lied on the Nuclear Sites Story, attempting to destroy our Patriot Pilots by making them look bad when, in fact, they did a GREAT job and hit pay dirt — TOTAL OBLITERATION! She should not be allowed to work at Fake News CNN. Its people like her who destroyed the reputation of a once great Network. Her slant was so obviously negative, besides, she doesnt have what it takes to be an on camera correspondent, not even close. FIRE NATASHA!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The claim that Natasha Bertrand “lied” on the Hunter Biden laptop story is unsubstantiated—there is no evidence she propagandized false information about it. Regarding recent U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites, Bertrand’s reporting aligns with assessments from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency and is corroborated by U.S. and Israeli intelligence: the strikes did not destroy the core of Iran’s nuclear program, contrary to political claims of “total obliteration.” Personal attacks in the post are subjective opinions not supported by evidence or the factual record.

Belief Alignment Analysis

This post directly opposes democratic values by promoting unfounded accusations, personal attacks, and calls for professional retribution without evidence—tactics that undermine free and fair discourse. The post elevates divisive rhetoric over principled debate and seeks to silence a journalist whose reporting is derived from verified intelligence sources. Such behavior threatens inclusivity and open dialogue, foundational principles in a democracy that belongs to all, not just those with the loudest or most aggressive voices.

Opinion

The demand to fire Natasha Bertrand is unjustified and based on disinformation and personal grievance, not fact. Celebrated for her rigorous coverage and recognized for her accomplishments, Bertrand represents the standards of an open press willing to challenge official narratives with hard evidence. Attempts to discredit her serve only to weaken trust in the press and embolden anti-democratic forces who attack truth-tellers for political gain.

TLDR

There is no substantiated evidence that Natasha Bertrand lied or misreported on either the Hunter Biden laptop or Iran nuclear strike stories. She was reporting verified assessments, not fabrications. The original post’s rhetoric is divisive, unsubstantiated, and contrary to the principles of a democratic, inclusive America.

Claim: Natasha Bertrand lied in her coverage of both the Hunter Biden laptop story and recent U.S. military strikes on Iran, and thus should be fired from CNN.

Fact: There is no evidence supporting claims that Bertrand lied or misreported on either story. Her reporting on Iran accurately reflects the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency’s findings, and no substantiated record connects her to false reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop. Her credentials and accolades further disprove allegations of professional incompetence.

Opinion: Attacks like these, which aim to silence journalists through smear campaigns and baseless accusations, threaten the core values of democracy—free speech, a robust and accountable press, and fact-based public discourse. America’s commitment to truth and inclusion is undermined when such tactics go unchallenged.