“I played Golf yesterday with the Great Roger Clemens and his son, Kacy. Roger Clemens was easily one of the few Greatest Pitchers of All Time, winning 354 Games, the Cy Young Award seven times (A Record, by a lot!), and played in six World Series, winning two! He was second to Nolan Ryan in most strike-outs, and he should be in the Baseball Hall of Fame, NOW! People think he took drugs, but nothing was proven. He never tested positive, and Roger, from the very beginning, totally denies it. He was just as great before those erroneous charges were leveled at him. That rumor has gone on for years, and there has been no evidence whatsoever that he was a druggie. This is going to be like Pete Rose where, after over 4,000 Hits, they wouldnt put him in the Hall of Fame until I spoke to the Commissioner, and he promised to do so, but it was essentially a promise not kept because he only opened it up when Pete died and, even then, he said that Pete Rose only got into the mix because of DEATH. We are not going to let that happen in the case of Roger Clemens. 354 Wins — Put him in NOW. He and his great family should not be forced to endure this stupidity any longer!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The post accurately lists Roger Clemens’ win total at 354 and his record seven Cy Young Awards. However, it incorrectly claims Clemens ranks second in career strikeouts (he ranks third) and overstates the absence of evidence for drug use, as there is significant testimony and physical evidence, though he was acquitted of perjury and never tested positive. The portrayal of Clemens’ Hall of Fame exclusion and comparison to Pete Rose contain exaggerations and factual errors: Commissioner Manfred’s decision to remove Rose from the ineligible list actually occurred posthumously, in response to a family petition, not through political lobbying.

Belief Alignment Analysis

The post blends accurate achievement-based arguments with dismissive, divisive rhetoric regarding allegations and Hall of Fame process. While highlighting issues of fairness, it undermines democratic discourse norms by labeling the situation as “stupidity” and entirely disregarding valid concerns about integrity in sports and a well-documented body of evidence. The tone does not foster inclusive or constructive debate, instead promoting grievance and mistrust toward governing institutions.

Opinion

While passionate appeals about Hall of Fame fairness are legitimate, accurate fact-based discussion should acknowledge the complexity of evidence against Clemens and the reasoning behind Hall of Fame voting patterns. A constructive dialogue would weigh both performance and integrity without hyperbole or personal attacks. Respect for due process and inclusion of multiple perspectives enhances civic engagement and trust.

TLDR

The post mixes true statistics with one notable error and overstates the lack of evidence against Clemens. Rhetoric is divisive rather than fostering fair, fact-driven debate about eligibility and Hall of Fame standards for controversial players.

Claim: Roger Clemens is unfairly excluded from the Hall of Fame despite unprecedented achievements and no proven drug use; Pete Rose was also only reinstated due to specific outside intervention.

Fact: Clemens has 354 wins and seven Cy Youngs but ranks third (not second) in all-time strikeouts. He was named in the Mitchell Report, subject to court testimony and evidence, and never tested positive but did face considerable evidence, though ultimately acquitted. Pete Rose’s reinstatement followed a posthumous policy change initiated by his family’s petition, not exclusive political lobbying.

Opinion: Clemens’ achievements are indisputable, yet Hall of Fame decisions reflect more than statistics, considering both legal and circumstantial evidence as well as standards of integrity. Rhetoric in the post oversimplifies these contentious issues.

TruthScore: 5

True: Clemens’ win total, Cy Young record, Rose’s hit total, lack of positive drug tests, and exclusion from Hall of Fame.

Hyperbole: Claiming “no evidence whatsoever” regarding drugs, overstating the effect of individual intervention for Rose, and dismissing all opposing views as “stupidity.”

Lies: Clemens is not second in career strikeouts; implying there is no evidence tying Clemens to drug allegations is inaccurate given the public record.