“I just watched Sloppy Chris Christie be interviewed on a ratings challenged News Show, This Week With George Slopadopolus, on ABC Fake News (By the way, what the hell happened to Jonathan Karls hair? He looks absolutely terrible! Its amazing what bad ratings, on a failed television show that was forced to pay me $16,000,000, can do to ones appearance!). Can anyone believe anything that Sloppy Chris says? Do you remember the way he lied about the dangerous and deadly closure of the George Washington Bridge in order to stay out of prison, at the same time sacrificing people who worked for him, including a young mother, who spent years trying to fight off the vicious charges against her. Chris refused to take responsibility for these criminal acts. For the sake of JUSTICE, perhaps we should start looking at that very serious situation again? NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DJT” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The post accurately notes Chris Christie’s appearance on “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos and the ABC settlement with Trump, but it misattributes the nature of the settlement and presents misleading and exaggerated claims regarding the Bridgegate scandal. The ABC settlement concerned a defamation case unrelated to Bridgegate, and while Bridgegate did involve Christie’s administration, he was never criminally charged. Key figures were convicted, but the Supreme Court unanimously overturned those convictions, ruling the actions were not federal crimes, though they did represent political abuse of power. Assertions about Christie’s direct criminal behavior or lying to avoid prison are unsupported by legal findings.

Belief Alignment Analysis

The language in the post is overtly hostile, contains personal insults, and uses pejorative nicknames, falling short of democratic norms of civility and constructive public discourse. The blending of factual claims with inflammatory rhetoric undermines trust in institutions and does not contribute to fair, inclusive, or reasoned debate. The repeated calls for renewed investigation appear politically motivated, lacking new substantiating evidence. Overall, the post relies more on division and personal attacks than on promoting civic engagement and public accountability.

Opinion

Fact-checking reveals a blend of truth, exaggeration, and unsupported assertions. Accurate reporting would focus on confirmed facts and clarify that while Bridgegate reflected administrative failures, it did not result in criminal convictions for Christie. The use of derogatory nicknames and unsubstantiated criminal allegations damages public trust and shifts focus from substantive civic issues.

TLDR

Chris Christie was on “This Week”; ABC settled with Trump over unrelated defamation. Bridgegate was an abuse of power, but Christie’s criminal culpability is unproven and uncharged. The post is accurate in some details, but riddled with distortions, hyperbole, and personal attacks that detract from democratic discourse.

Claim: Chris Christie lied about Bridgegate to avoid prison, sacrificed subordinates, and ABC paid Trump $16M because of bad ratings and coverage.

Fact: Christie was never charged in Bridgegate, which resulted in convictions for subordinates that the Supreme Court later overturned. ABC did settle for $15-16M with Trump, but this was due to defamation litigation, not ratings or Bridgegate coverage.

Opinion: The post exaggerates Christie’s criminal responsibility and combines factual events with baseless insults and biased framing, undermining constructive dialogue.

TruthScore: 3

True: Christie’s TV appearance; ABC settlement (amount, but not reason); Bridgegate did involve Christie’s administration.

Hyperbole: Claims Christie “sacrificed” others, ABC’s motives attributed to ratings, Christie’s direct criminality implied without charges, and repeated personal insults.

Lies: That Christie lied to avoid prison, was criminally culpable in Bridgegate, and ABC’s settlement was for coverage or ratings rather than defamation litigation.