Fact-Check Summary
The claim that the Utah court order is “absolutely Unconstitutional” fundamentally mischaracterizes Judge Dianna Gibson’s August 25, 2025 decision, which found Utah’s current congressional map violated the state constitution, not the other way around. Independent legal review and Utah Supreme Court precedent confirm the order’s procedural and constitutional legitimacy. The post accurately notes that Utah currently sends four Republicans to Congress and that Trump has consistently won the state. However, its characterization of “Radical Left Judges” and motivation to “take away our Congressional advantage” is unfounded, misrepresenting the nonpartisan and constitutional basis of the ruling to enforce anti-gerrymandering reforms approved by Utah voters.
Belief Alignment Analysis
The post undermines trust in democratic institutions by disparaging the judiciary as “Radical Left” and framing legal decisions as overtly partisan attacks. This rhetoric fails to support inclusive, civil discourse and dismisses the independence of the judiciary, a core component of democracy. It actively fosters division rather than constructive engagement, disregarding both the rule of law and the will of Utah’s voters as expressed through a citizen initiative for fair redistricting.
Opinion
Challenging the constitutionality of a court ruling is a legitimate part of public debate. However, misrepresenting judicial decisions and labeling judges as partisan actors erodes civic trust and fails to engage the facts. Utah’s judiciary followed constitutional and democratic procedures to respect the will of the voters and address concerns over gerrymandering. Hyperbolic and hostile rhetoric in the post detracts from factual debate and undermines public accountability.
TLDR
The post’s main claim is false—the court order is not unconstitutional. Utah’s courts acted to uphold the state constitution and voter-approved reforms. The post is correct about current Republican congressional representation and Trump’s electoral wins in the state, but its inflammatory rhetoric against judges and claims of partisan motivation are unfounded and undermine democratic norms.
Claim: Monday’s Utah court order is “absolutely Unconstitutional” and issued by “Radical Left Judges” to undermine Republican representation.
Fact: The ruling found Utah’s congressional map unconstitutional based on voter-approved legal standards; Judge Gibson’s decision is consistent with state law and Supreme Court precedent.
Opinion: The post misrepresents the court’s legal basis and uses divisive rhetoric without evidence.
TruthScore: 3
True: Utah currently sends four Republicans to Congress; Trump has won Utah in recent elections.
Hyperbole: Claims of “Radical Left Judges” and courts seeking to “take away Congressional advantage.”
Lies: Calling the court order “absolutely Unconstitutional.”