“Now that the Democrats are using the Epstein Hoax, involving Democrats, not Republicans, to try and deflect from their disastrous SHUTDOWN, and all of their other failures, I will be asking A.G. Pam Bondi, and the Department of Justice, together with our great patriots at the FBI, to investigate Jeffrey Epsteins involvement and relationship with Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, Reid Hoffman, J.P. Morgan, Chase, and many other people and institutions, to determine what was going on with them, and him. This is another Russia, Russia, Russia Scam, with all arrows pointing to the Democrats. Records show that these men, and many others, spent large portions of their life with Epstein, and on his Island. Stay tuned!!!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The post mislabels the Epstein investigation as a “hoax” and makes exaggerated partisan claims. Epstein was a convicted sex offender, with crimes supported by substantial evidence. The ties between figures like Bill Clinton, Lawrence Summers, Reid Hoffman, and JPMorgan Chase to Epstein are documented but do not support claims of spending “large portions of their life” with him, nor do they confirm illegal activity or heavy involvement. The recent document releases reference people across the political spectrum, including Donald Trump. There is no credible evidence that Democrats are using the Epstein case only to distract from the government shutdown. Multiple bipartisan calls have demanded full disclosure of all relevant Epstein documents.

Belief Alignment Analysis

The post undermines truthful, responsible civic dialogue by using hyperbolic and divisive language, making unverified or oversimplified accusations, and distorting established facts for political gain. Rather than supporting transparency or accountability, it selectively reframes events for partisan advantage, running counter to democratic principles of reason, inclusion, and factual discourse.

Opinion

Posts that mischaracterize major criminal cases for partisan attacks damage the integrity of democratic debate. Vigorous, evidence-based scrutiny of all who interacted with Jeffrey Epstein is necessary, but shifting blame without accurate context undermines public trust and the pursuit of truth. Instead, public leaders and commentators should promote transparency and a nonpartisan approach to accountability.

TLDR

The post badly distorts the facts about the Epstein case, mislabels real crimes as a “hoax,” and tries to weaponize the story for political purposes. Evidence shows bipartisan links to Epstein and no exclusive benefit or blame for Democrats. Claims of a Democratic “scam” lack substantiation.

Claim: Democrats are using the “Epstein Hoax” involving Democrats (not Republicans) as a distraction from a shutdown; all arrows point to Democrats, who spent large portions of their life with Epstein.

Fact: Epstein’s crimes are documented and not a hoax. Both Democrats and Republicans appear in Epstein-related documents. Connections to high-profile individuals exist but are not as extensive or sinister across the board as described. Document releases occurred after the shutdown and reflected bipartisan interest.

Opinion: This post uses misleading, divisive rhetoric that runs counter to factual accountability and the norms of fair public discourse.

TruthScore: 2

True: Some prominent Democrats (and Republicans) had contact with Epstein or his businesses; there is recent document disclosure.

Hyperbole: Framing the entire Epstein case as a “hoax” and claiming “all arrows point to the Democrats”; implying Democrats uniquely benefit from or direct the narrative.

Lies: Asserting the Epstein scandal is a hoax and solely linked to Democrats; ignoring evidence of bipartisan connections and the gravity of Epstein’s crimes.