“Why does ABC Fake News keep Jimmy Kimmel, a man with NO TALENT and VERY POOR TELEVISION RATINGS, on the air? Why do the TV Syndicates put up with it? Also, totally biased coverage. Get the bum off the air!!!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The post criticizes ABC for keeping Jimmy Kimmel on air, citing "NO TALENT" and "VERY POOR TELEVISION RATINGS." While Kimmel’s ratings have declined over the years, his show remains competitive for its time slot, often ranking second among late-night network shows. The claim of "no talent" and characterization of ABC as "Fake News" are subjective opinions, not verifiable facts.

Belief Alignment Analysis

This post employs hostile and divisive rhetoric, labeling ABC as "Fake News" and using insults against Kimmel. Such language undermines civil, inclusive discourse and diminishes the credibility of debate by substituting partisan attacks for factual engagement. The criticisms lack constructive engagement and do not reflect respect for pluralistic democratic discourse.

Opinion

While Kimmel’s ratings have trended downward, so too have those of the entire late-night category. Economic viability for these programs involves considerations beyond simple ratings, such as affiliate fees and strategic network decisions. Subjective attacks and pejoratives about talent or news bias do little to foster truthful, good-faith discussion about media performance or democratic values.

TLDR

Kimmel’s ratings have declined but remain competitive for the format. The post’s claim about "very poor ratings" lacks context and exaggerates shortcomings. Accusations of "no talent" and ABC as "Fake News" are opinions, not facts. The rhetoric is divisive and misleading, reflecting more about partisan animosity than objective reality.

Claim: Jimmy Kimmel has no talent, has very poor ratings, and ABC (“Fake News”) should remove him from the air because of bias and lack of performance.

Fact: Jimmy Kimmel’s ratings have declined but are still competitive within network late night television. He continues to attract significant audiences and his show serves a function in network economics beyond basic ratings. "No talent" and bias claims are unprovable, subjective opinions.

Opinion: The post’s tone is divisive and distorts the facts by omitting context, using insults, and making unverifiable judgments. It diminishes discussion quality and does not align with constructive or democratic norms.

TruthScore: 4

True: Kimmel’s ratings have dropped significantly from earlier years and are sometimes lower than other network or cable late night shows.

Hyperbole: Describing ratings as "VERY POOR" without comparative context; accusations of "NO TALENT" and blanket assertion ABC is "Fake News." Pejorative language like "bum."

Lies: There are no outright lies; rather, there is significant distortion and omission of context, but key numeric elements are not invented.