Fact-Check Summary
The claim that “many great legal scholars agree that the Democrat traitors that told the military to disobey my orders as President have committed a crime of serious proportion” is not supported by evidence. The referenced video by six Democratic lawmakers reminded military members of their duty to refuse illegal orders—a stance fully consistent with established law and doctrine. No credible legal scholars concur that a major crime was committed; on the contrary, experts indicate the lawmakers restated accepted military obligations, not criminal incitement.
Belief Alignment Analysis
The post employs divisive and accusatory language, labeling elected officials as “traitors” without substantiated evidence. It characterizes lawful, constitutionally protected speech as criminal, undermining public trust in democratic institutions and civic discourse. Rather than fostering constructive engagement or respect for democratic norms, the post uses inflammatory rhetoric that erodes civil debate and misrepresents both the law and the facts.
Opinion
This claim is a clear attempt to delegitimize political opponents through the language of criminality and treason, despite a complete lack of legal consensus. Such tactics do not contribute to honest public discussion or democratic accountability. Political disagreement is not a crime, and upholding constitutional military obligations should be commended, not condemned.
TLDR
No credible legal or military expert agrees that urging service members to refuse illegal orders constitutes a “serious crime.” The post’s claim is not just unsupported—it contradicts established law and expert consensus. It misleads the public while relying on hostile and divisive rhetoric.
Claim: MANY GREAT LEGAL SCHOLARS AGREE THAT THE DEMOCRAT TRAITORS THAT TOLD THE MILITARY TO DISOBEY MY ORDERS AS PRESIDENT HAVE COMMITTED A CRIME OF SERIOUS PROPORTION
Fact: No credible legal scholars or expert bodies support the allegation. Military law and doctrine universally affirm that service members are duty-bound to disobey illegal orders. The referenced statements aligned with doctrine and did not constitute a crime.
Opinion: The post is inflammatory, seeks to criminalize legitimate constitutional speech, and misrepresents both intent and law for political ends.
TruthScore: 1
True: Democratic lawmakers did release a video reminding service members to refuse illegal orders; this accurately reflects military law.
Hyperbole: Language describing elected officials as “traitors” and suggesting their actions are a major crime represents significant exaggeration and misleading framing.
Lies: The assertion that “many great legal scholars agree” the lawmakers committed a crime is refuted by fact; no such agreement exists among credible experts.