“Immigration and Nationality Act, Section 212(f): Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The quoted language from Immigration and Nationality Act Section 212(f) is a faithful and essentially verbatim representation of the statute as it appears in federal law (8 U.S.C. § 1182(f)). Multiple legal and government sources confirm the accuracy of this text. However, while the statute does grant sweeping authority to the President to suspend entry of non-citizens deemed “detrimental to the interests of the United States,” court rulings have clarified important limitations—most notably that this power cannot be used to override specific asylum protections or certain other statutory requirements. In summary, the post is accurate but lacks this critical context.

Belief Alignment Analysis

The post cites the statutory language directly and refrains from hyperbole, inflammatory rhetoric, or divisive framing. By accurately referencing the law without additional misleading commentary, the post upholds the democratic value of fact-based public discourse. Nonetheless, providing only the statutory text—in isolation—risks omission of the contemporary context and judicially imposed boundaries essential for full civic understanding. Inclusion of relevant legal interpretations would enhance transparency and public comprehension.

Opinion

The claim is true in its quotation of the Immigration and Nationality Act Section 212(f) as currently codified. However, readers should be aware that real-world application of this power is subject to limits delineated by the judiciary, particularly regarding asylum access and conflict with other federal statutes. Responsible public discourse should acknowledge these nuances to prevent the misapprehension that the President’s authority under this statute is absolute or unreviewable.

TLDR

The post presents the correct statutory language from Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, but omits important context on judicial limits. The text is accurate, but real-world usage is more restricted than the statute alone implies.

Claim: The quoted text is the operative language of Immigration and Nationality Act Section 212(f).

Fact: The text is a nearly verbatim and substantively accurate quotation of Section 212(f), as confirmed by federal sources. Its legal application is subject to judicially recognized limits.

Opinion: The statement is factual for its verbatim quotation but could mislead readers by omission of practical constraints on presidential authority.

TruthScore: 10

True: The quote accurately matches the statutory language.

Hyperbole: None present; the claim is stated factually and without exaggeration.

Lies: None; the statement is accurate as presented.