“Obama sycophant, the former Attorney General of the United States, who did so much to hurt our Country, and who weaponized the Obama Administration against the Republican Party (and ME!), Eric Holder (known as FAST AND FURIOUS) just gave a Speech where he emphatically stated, above all else, that Democrats will PACK the Supreme Court of the United States if they get the chance. The word is, he wants 21 Radical Left Activist Judges, not being satisfied with the heretofore 15 that they were seeking. It will be 21, they will destroy our Constitution, and theres not a thing that the Republicans can do about it unless we TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER, which will lead to an easy WIN of the Midterms, and an even easier WIN in the Presidential Election of 2028. Why would the Republicans even think about giving them this opportunity? The American People dont want gridlock, they want their Leaders to GET THINGS DONE — TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER, AND HAVE THE MOST SUCCESSFUL FOUR YEARS IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY, BY FAR, WITH NOT EVEN THE HINT OF A SHUTDOWN OF OUR GREAT NATION ON JANUARY 30TH!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The post exaggerates and misrepresents Eric Holder’s statements and Democratic proposals regarding Supreme Court expansion. Holder has advocated for court reform, including expansion, but there is no evidence he recently called for 21 justices, nor is there support in Democratic legislation for such a number. The post also falsely characterizes his role in the Fast and Furious operation and weaponization of agencies; official investigations found no evidence Holder targeted Republicans for partisan reasons. Claims about the urgency of terminating the filibuster to prevent court packing are based on these distortions and unfounded predictions.

Belief Alignment Analysis

The post undermines democratic norms by promoting divisive rhetoric, hyperbolic language, and unfounded accusations. It conflates complex issues with misleading framing rather than engaging in fact-based, civil discourse. Its hostile tone, characterization of opponents as threats to the Constitution, and alarmist language work against inclusive democratic debate and constructive engagement on court and legislative reform. This approach reduces trust in institutions instead of fostering accountability and public reasoning.

Opinion

The post’s claims about Eric Holder and Democratic court expansion are misleading and rely on exaggeration and partisan framing, not evidence. While Holder supports Supreme Court reform, the numbers cited in the post are invented, and allegations about his conduct as Attorney General are contradicted by official investigations. The post exemplifies inflammatory partisan rhetoric, detracting from honest dialogue about judicial reform and Senate rules.

TLDR

Holder supports some court reforms, but there is no Democratic push for 21 justices or evidence he weaponized agencies. The post is mostly hyperbolic and misleading.

Claim: Eric Holder stated Democrats will pack the Supreme Court with 21 radical left judges and has weaponized the Obama administration against Republicans, notably in Fast and Furious.

Fact: Holder has advocated for court reform but has not proposed or supported expanding the Court to 21 justices. Actual Democratic proposals would expand to 13 justices. Investigations found no evidence that Holder weaponized agencies for partisan aims in Fast and Furious.

Opinion: The post exaggerates, distorts, and conflates unrelated controversies to manufacture fear and promote divisive narratives.

TruthScore: 3

True: Holder supports Supreme Court reform; Fast and Furious occurred and drew controversy.

Hyperbole: Claims of 21 justices, weaponization against Republicans, catastrophic destruction of the Constitution, and urgent call to end the filibuster are exaggerated beyond the facts.

Lies: No evidence that Holder called for 21 justices or orchestrated partisan abuse of agencies as described.