“Who has the worst Late Night host, CBS, ABC, or NBC??? They all have three things in common: High Salaries, No Talent, REALLY LOW RATINGS!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The post accurately states that CBS, ABC, and NBC have late-night hosts who receive high salaries. Ratings for these shows have declined substantially compared to previous decades, though they remain the top programs in their time slots and retain millions of viewers. The claim of “no talent” is entirely subjective and unverifiable. The post’s framing exaggerates the ratings decline and omits essential context about industry-wide viewing trends, making the critique misleading.

Belief Alignment Analysis

The post employs dismissive, divisive rhetoric by categorically labeling late-night hosts as talentless and characterizing their ratings as “really low” without context. Such language undermines respectful, evidence-based civic discourse and misrepresents complex realities of the entertainment industry. The framing undercuts public reason and does not align with democratic values of fairness or inclusion.

Opinion

A fact-based critique would acknowledge ratings decline and high salaries while recognizing that talent is subjective and ratings context matters. Dismissing entire groups as “no talent” fosters division, not constructive engagement. A more accurate, democratic approach requires precise context, nuanced criticism, and avoidance of sweeping character judgments.

TLDR

High salaries and declining ratings are true; talent is subjective. The post’s framing is exaggerated and misleading, lacking crucial context about why ratings have fallen and where late-night hosts still succeed.

Claim: CBS, ABC, and NBC late-night hosts all have high salaries, no talent, and really low ratings.

Fact: Late-night hosts on these networks indeed have high salaries ($5–16 million/year). Television ratings are at historic lows compared to previous decades, but these programs still lead their time slots and have millions of viewers. “No talent” is a subjective and unverifiable assertion.

Opinion: While the observations about salaries and ratings are grounded in fact, dismissing hosts as “no talent” and ignoring context around media industry changes is unfair and divisive.

TruthScore: 6

True: Late-night hosts receive high salaries. Ratings are down compared to historical peaks.

Hyperbole: “No talent,” “REALLY LOW RATINGS” (without qualifying that the shows still lead their slots and retain large audiences).

Lies: No outright lies—core assertions contain factual elements but are misleading without key context.