“A front page Article in The Fake News Wall Street Journal states, without any verification, that I offered Jamie Dimon, of JPMorgan Chase, the job of Fed Chairman. This statement is totally untrue, there was never such an offer and, in fact, Ill be suing JPMorgan Chase over the next two weeks for incorrectly and inappropriately DEBANKING me after the January 6th Protest, a protest that turned out to be correct for those doing the protesting — The Election was RIGGED! Why wouldnt The Wall Street Journal call me to ask whether or not such an offer was made? I would have very quickly told them, NO, and that would have been the end of the story. Also, one was led to believe that I offered Jamie Dimon the job of Secretary of the Treasury, but that would be one that he would be very interested in. The problem is, I have Scott Bessent doing a fantastic job, A SUPERSTAR — Why would I give it to Jamie? No such offer was made there, or even thought of, either. The Wall Street Journal ought to do better fact checking, or its already strained credibility will continue to DIVE. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

Donald Trump’s post denying that he ever offered JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon the job of Federal Reserve Chairman stands in direct contradiction to multiple credible news reports. These reports, based on sources familiar with White House deliberations, indicate that such an offer was made in a confidential setting, even if Dimon himself never publicly confirmed the account. Trump’s statement about suing JPMorgan Chase for “debanking” aligns with his announced legal intentions, but his assertions about the political motivation for account closures are denied by the banks involved. His criticism of the Wall Street Journal’s fact-checking is partly valid if they failed to seek direct comment but cannot be confirmed with available evidence.

Belief Alignment Analysis

The post employs strident language, absolute denials, and accusations of media bias, reflecting divisive rhetoric rather than fostering inclusive or civil discourse. It resists transparency about conflicting public statements and democratic accountability, favoring blanket rejections over constructive clarification. By refusing to acknowledge plausible counterevidence or the need for public reason, the post undermines core democratic discourse norms.

Opinion

While Trump’s denial may seize on the lack of direct evidence from Jamie Dimon or himself, it disregards established standards for public accountability when dismissing consistent, corroborated journalism from multiple reputable outlets. His plans to sue JPMorgan Chase rest on a factual account of bank actions but veer into unsupported claims about their motives. The rhetoric prioritizes defensiveness and division over transparent, fact-based engagement.

TLDR

Trump’s categorical denials about offering Dimon the Fed job are contradicted by multiple reports; his suit against JPMorgan Chase is factually accurate but the motivations are disputed; media criticism relies partly on an unverifiable assumption about verification. The post favors divisive language over democratic values of transparency and evidence.

Claim: Trump never offered Jamie Dimon the job of Fed Chairman, will sue JPMorgan Chase for debanking him for political reasons, and claims the Wall Street Journal failed at fact-checking.

Fact: Credible reports from informed sources state Trump did offer Dimon the Fed job; Trump’s intent to sue JPMorgan Chase is documented but banks deny political motivations; the original Wall Street Journal verification process is unclear.

Opinion: The post’s blanket denials, blame-shifting, and incendiary tone undermine public trust and democratic norms by refusing transparent engagement with credible counterevidence.

TruthScore: 4

True: Trump has announced lawsuit intentions and account closures occurred. The Wall Street Journal did report the Dimon offer.

Hyperbole: Describing the protest as “correct,” calling the election “RIGGED,” and sweeping condemnation of media as “fake news” and entirely lacking credibility.

Lies: Stating “there was never such an offer” is contradicted by well-sourced reporting, making this element substantially false.