TruthSocial.com

“RT @pengal82Insurrection. TREASON!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary The Truth Social post labels January 6 as both “Insurrection” and “TREASON.” Multiple government bodies, including the House of Representatives, justice agencies, and bipartisan commissions, have officially categorized January 6 as an insurrection. However, the constitutional definition of treason is highly specific, requiring the levying of war against the United States or providing […]

“RT @pengal82Insurrection. TREASON!” @realDonaldTrump 4 Read More »

“RT @DSharp1958Sedition” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary No substantive content was submitted for verification. The post referenced a Truth Social RT from user “DSharp1958” with mention of “Sedition,” but did not provide any actual text or claims to fact-check. As a result, no factual accuracy assessment can be performed. Belief Alignment Analysis Because the query lacks any actual rhetoric, claims,

“RT @DSharp1958Sedition” @realDonaldTrump 0 Read More »

“RT @sandyjpIndict all of them.” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary The statement “RT sandyjp Indict all of them” lacks any concrete factual assertions, naming no individuals, providing no evidence, and specifying no alleged actions. There is no basis for factual verification or refutation. It is best understood as an expression of sentiment, not a verifiable claim. Belief Alignment Analysis The content does not

“RT @sandyjpIndict all of them.” @realDonaldTrump 0 Read More »

“RT @P78HANG THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD !!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary The Truth Social post with the phrase “RT P78HANG THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD” is a clear example of violent rhetoric. The claim that George Washington would endorse such violence is historically inaccurate. Founding principles under Washington emphasized rule of law and peaceful discourse, not extrajudicial violence. The post’s content is dangerous as it

“RT @P78HANG THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD !!” @realDonaldTrump 1 Read More »

“RT @Nathan6617Traitors” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary The social media post, “RT Nathan6617Traitors”, lacks substantive content or context to verify any factual claim. Without the actual content of what is being retweeted or discussed, there is nothing to confirm, dispute, or analyze for factual accuracy. Belief Alignment Analysis Using terms like “traitors” in political discourse is divisive and undermines inclusive,

“RT @Nathan6617Traitors” @realDonaldTrump 0 Read More »

“RT @wanttoinformThose democrat veterans took the same oath I did to defend this country from domestic enemies. Its a lifetime commitment.What should they do, what should the American people do when the domestic enemy is them?Al Qaeda is a foreign enemy who declared war on this nation on 09/11/2001.Theyve never sued for peace, so when Obama was giving aid to al Qaeda Libyan Rebels in Benghazi and the veteran democrat congress members were part of that coverup, its no wonder they are now asking members of our military to commit treason on their behalf.” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary The post blends some accurate elements—such as the military oath and Al Qaeda’s responsibility for 9/11—with several disproven or unsubstantiated allegations. Key claims regarding the Obama administration deliberately aiding Al Qaeda through Libyan rebels and Democratic veterans orchestrating a coverup of these actions are directly contradicted by official congressional investigations. The assertion that

“RT @wanttoinformThose democrat veterans took the same oath I did to defend this country from domestic enemies. Its a lifetime commitment.What should they do, what should the American people do when the domestic enemy is them?Al Qaeda is a foreign enemy who declared war on this nation on 09/11/2001.Theyve never sued for peace, so when Obama was giving aid to al Qaeda Libyan Rebels in Benghazi and the veteran democrat congress members were part of that coverup, its no wonder they are now asking members of our military to commit treason on their behalf.” @realDonaldTrump 2 Read More »

“RT @enigma48The Dems are getting closer and closer to being on their way out.” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary The claim that “The Dems are getting closer and closer to being on their way out” is directly contradicted by current evidence. Democrats recently secured sweeping victories in the 2025 off-year elections, with polling data indicating a strong Democratic lead on the congressional ballot nationwide. Furthermore, public approval ratings and issue polling do

“RT @enigma48The Dems are getting closer and closer to being on their way out.” @realDonaldTrump 1 Read More »

“RT @Jet63If they dont follow orders they should be fired” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary The statement, “If they dont follow orders they should be fired,” reflects a simplistic interpretation of American employment law but cannot be independently verified as an authentic post from the cited source, Jet63. At-will employment doctrine allows employers to terminate employees for insubordination, but extensive legal exceptions and procedural safeguards exist. No direct

“RT @Jet63If they dont follow orders they should be fired” @realDonaldTrump 4 Read More »

“RT @DeplorableWorldNewsiA!nd they can be brought to justice under the UCMJ, get busted down or Dishonorably Discharged, and lose their career and benefits. Step right into that 💩. Thats the ticket.” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary The post claims that individuals (implied to be military service members) “can be brought to justice under the UCMJ, get busted down or Dishonorably Discharged and lose their career and benefits.” This is factually accurate: the UCMJ is a real legal framework, court-martial and administrative actions can result in demotion or dishonorable discharge,

“RT @DeplorableWorldNewsiA!nd they can be brought to justice under the UCMJ, get busted down or Dishonorably Discharged, and lose their career and benefits. Step right into that 💩. Thats the ticket.” @realDonaldTrump 9 Read More »

“RT @Earl34Anything these traitors disagree with is what they consider an illegal order. They are all a disgrace to their uniforms.” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary The post claims that military officers and lawmakers label any order they disagree with as “illegal” and accuses them of being “traitors.” This conflates legislative concerns about the lawfulness of orders with mere policy disagreements and misrepresents established military law. Military law requires refusal of manifestly illegal orders, not those with which service

“RT @Earl34Anything these traitors disagree with is what they consider an illegal order. They are all a disgrace to their uniforms.” @realDonaldTrump 3 Read More »