Fact-Check Summary
Claims in the post about presidential autopen use are misleading and legally inaccurate. Existing law, Justice Department opinions, and historical precedent confirm that presidents, including Biden, can authorize the autopen for official acts, and these documents remain legally valid when properly authorized. Statements that autopen-signed actions are “absolutely illegal” or void are incorrect. The claim that there was no documentation authorizing autopen use is contradicted by investigative findings, which identified written evidence of a decision-making process, though some procedural ambiguities remain. Most notably, all assertions regarding the 2020 election outcome being “rigged” are demonstrably false, having been refuted by extensive litigation, audits, and bipartisan certification of results.
Belief Alignment Analysis
The post undermines democratic discourse by advancing unsubstantiated claims, spreading misinformation, and inflaming distrust in legitimate institutions. Its language is divisive and accusatory, branding officials as “insurrectionists” and calling for arrests without evidence. These rhetorical strategies erode public trust, foster hostility, and risk harm to democratic norms of civility and peaceful political disagreement. The arguments neglect constructive engagement with evidence and responsible debate, favoring conspiracy and delegitimization instead.
Opinion
While scrutiny of presidential procedures is warranted, sweeping and inflammatory assertions not grounded in evidence or law are counterproductive and misleading. Responsible discourse requires distinguishing unresolved legal questions from outright falsehoods and respecting the established outcomes of democratic processes. The promotion of thoroughly debunked election claims, especially by a former president, is both factually and democratically irresponsible.
TLDR
The post’s central legal and election claims are largely false and misleading, contradicting established precedent and thorough investigations. Its rhetoric fails democratic standards of inclusion, civility, and evidence-based debate.
Claim: Biden’s autopen use is totally illegal, documents signed that way are void, the process lacked written authorization, and the 2020 election was rigged and illegitimate.
Fact: U.S. law, Department of Justice opinions, and legal precedent support the validity of autopen-signed documents when authorized by the president. Written authorization processes were in place, albeit with some procedural uncertainty. No credible evidence substantiates claims that the 2020 election was rigged or illegitimate; these results were repeatedly certified and upheld by courts, election officials, and security agencies.
Opinion: The post employs hyperbolic, conspiratorial language to delegitimize lawful government procedures and the integrity of American elections.
TruthScore: 1
True: There are isolated reports of ambiguity about the internal authorization process for some autopen uses, and robust debate persists among a minority of legal scholars regarding autopen constitutionality.
Hyperbole: Claims that Biden’s administration consists of “Radical Left Insurrectionists,” that all involved “should be arrested,” and that Biden’s presidency is entirely illegitimate.
Lies: Assertions that autopen use is inherently illegal and voids presidential actions, that there was no written order at all, and that the 2020 election was rigged and not legitimately won by Biden.