Fact-Check Summary
The social media post praises Art Del Cueto and Jack Brewer for their border work and asserts that there have been “zero people entering illegally for the last 3 months” under the Trump administration, contrasting this with claims of “hundreds of thousands” of entries, many involving gangs and criminals, during the Biden/Harris years. Official government data confirms a dramatic drop in illegal border releases to zero for three consecutive months in 2025, but thousands of cross-border apprehensions and encounters are still happening monthly. The statement conflates “zero releases” — a policy outcome — with “zero entries,” which is inaccurate. Data from the Biden administration does show extremely high border encounter numbers, peaking at nearly 250,000 in a month, but the claim regarding migrants from gangs, prisons, and mental institutions is unsubstantiated and generalized.
Belief Alignment Analysis
Accurate, responsibly communicated information is vital for a free, fair, and inclusive democracy. The claim of “zero people entering illegally” distorts the facts and could mislead the public, undermining rational discourse and informed policy debate. Equating migration broadly with criminality or mental instability fosters unnecessary division and stokes fear, potentially alienating individuals and communities. The post appears more focused on amplifying political achievements and criticisms rather than providing clear, context-driven reporting for all Americans. Such rhetoric, if left unchecked, risks eroding democratic norms by placing power, spectacle, or partisanship above principle and inclusivity.
Opinion
While achievements in border enforcement and reductions in releases are noteworthy and merit mention in any informed discussion about immigration, exaggerations and incomplete narratives ultimately do a disservice to the nation. Fact-based, nuanced conversation is essential — especially on complex issues like border security. Succumbing to sensationalism or incomplete reporting for short-term political gain undermines both public trust and the idea of America as a nation that belongs to all people, not just the most vocal or politically empowered.
TLDR
The post’s “zero illegal entries” claim is false — border encounters persist, though releases have stopped. Biden-era border crossings did reach historic highs, but claims about widespread criminality among migrants lack credible evidence. The conversation should focus on facts, shared responsibility, and fairness, not partisan spin or fearmongering.
Claim: The Trump administration has achieved “zero people entering illegally for the last 3 months,” while the previous Biden administration allowed “hundreds of thousands” of criminals and the mentally ill to cross the border.
Fact: Border Patrol data confirms three straight months of zero illegal border releases, but thousands of illegal entries and apprehensions persist each month. Biden-era numbers did exceed 100,000 per month, but there is no solid evidence that most migrants were gang members, criminals, or from mental institutions. Generalizations in the post are misleading and unsupported by data.
Opinion: Reducing border releases is a noteworthy policy achievement, but distorting statistics and vilifying migrants undermines democracy, damages civic trust, and weakens the nation’s commitment to fairness and inclusion.