“I am pleased to nominate Megan Benton to serve as Judge on the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Megan earned her J.D. from the highly respected Vanderbilt University Law School, worked as a prosecutor in the Platte County Prosecuting Attorneys Office, and is currently delivering strong results for the Rule of Law as a Trial Court Judge in Platte County. The Great State of Missouri deserves a fighter like Megan who will always protect our Constitution, and ensure Liberty and Justice FOR ALL. Congratulations Megan!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The key claim that Judge Megan Benton has been nominated to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri is unsubstantiated and appears to be false; no official records support her nomination or confirmation to this federal post as of November 14, 2025. Statements about Benton’s educational credentials (earning a J.D. from Vanderbilt University Law School) and her career as a prosecutor in the Platte County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office are factually accurate. Her current position as a Circuit Judge in Missouri is also accurate, though the post’s description is somewhat imprecise. Overall, the post mixes true biographical data with a central claim that is factually unsupported.

Belief Alignment Analysis

This post largely uses civil and positive language but misleads on a core matter of democratic process by asserting a federal nomination that did not occur. Spreading inaccurate information about judicial appointments undermines public trust in the mechanisms of government transparency and accountability. While recognizing professional merits, the exaggeration of an official act without factual basis does not align with standards of truthful and responsible civic communication.

Opinion

Although it is commendable to celebrate public servants and acknowledge their accomplishments, accuracy is critical when referring to official acts such as federal judicial nominations. Credibility depends on precise, corroborated statements—particularly in matters of public record. In this case, the biographical facts are compelling but the false nomination claim damages the post’s overall trustworthiness and risks misleading the public.

TLDR

The post is factually accurate about Megan Benton’s background, but the centerpiece claim of her federal court nomination is inaccurate and unsupported by any official source. The misstatement undermines the value of the otherwise true information included.

Claim: Judge Megan Benton was nominated to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Fact: There is no official record or credible reporting supporting this nomination as of November 14, 2025. Benton’s biographical and career achievements cited in the post are accurate, but the federal nomination claim is false.

Opinion: Praising a public official is positive, but inaccurately attributing a federal appointment misleads the public and degrades factual civic engagement.

TruthScore: 4

True: Megan Benton earned a J.D. from Vanderbilt University Law School; she worked as a prosecutor in Platte County; she is currently a Missouri Circuit Judge.

Hyperbole: Phrasing about “delivering strong results for the Rule of Law” and “fighter … to protect our Constitution” employs subjective and promotional rhetoric.

Lies: The claim that Benton has been nominated to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri is not supported by any official record and is false.