“Tariffs are having a huge positive impact on the Stock Market. Almost every day, new records are set. In addition, Hundreds of Billions of Dollars are pouring into our Countrys coffers. If a Radical Left Court ruled against us at this late date, in an attempt to bring down or disturb the largest amount of money, wealth creation and influence the U.S.A. has ever seen, it would be impossible to ever recover, or pay back, these massive sums of money and honor. It would be 1929 all over again, a GREAT DEPRESSION! If they were going to rule against the wealth, strength, and power of America, they should have done so LONG AGO, at the beginning of the case, where our entire Country, while never having a chance at this kind of GREATNESS again, would not have been put in 1929 style jeopardy. There is no way America could recover from such a judicial tragedy, but I know our Court System better than anyone, there is no one in history that has gone through the trials, tribulations and uncertainties such as I, and absolutely terrible, but also amazingly beautiful, things can happen. Our Country deserves SUCCESS AND GREATNESS, NOT TURMOIL, FAILURE, AND DISGRACE. GOD BLESS AMERICA!” @realDonaldTrump

Fact-Check Summary

The reviewed Truth Social post makes sweeping claims about the positive effects of tariffs on the stock market, federal revenue, and the broader U.S. economy, while predicting a catastrophic outcome if courts intervene against these policies. Fact-checking shows that while federal revenue from tariffs has risen sharply and the stock market has reached record highs, there is no strong evidence that tariffs alone are responsible for market records. In fact, tariffs have often created market volatility and losses, and most economists warn that their long-term effects (reduced growth, higher prices) are negative. Assertions about “hundreds of billions” flowing in omit that these revenues come from U.S. importers and are passed on to consumers. The comparison to the Great Depression is not supported by historic or economic data, as adverse court rulings are unlikely to trigger 1929-style collapse. The claims, while rooted in partial truths, are exaggerated and misleading overall.

Belief Alignment Analysis

The post does not foster inclusive or civil discourse, instead painting courts as radical and catastrophizing judicial review with unsupported historical comparisons. Such rhetoric undermines faith in balanced institutional oversight and distorts the accountability of democratic processes. The language is hyperbolic and divisive, favoring power over principle and bypassing constructive public reasoning.

Opinion

Public debate should be informed by evidence-based economic analysis rather than alarmist or exceptionalist rhetoric. Tariff policy is complex and deserves honest discussion of both its costs and benefits. Respect for the court system and an accurate appraisal of economic risks are essential for healthy civic discourse and trust in democratic institutions.

TLDR

The post exaggerates the benefits of tariffs and the risks of court oversight. While tariff revenue is up, so are consumer costs and economic risks. Comparisons to the Great Depression are misleading. Civil, fact-based discourse is necessary to weigh the real impacts of trade policy and judicial review.

Claim: Tariffs are driving stock market records and flood the treasury with hundreds of billions, courts threatening these policies would trigger a new Great Depression.

Fact: Stock market highs have occurred, but largely independent of tariffs, which caused notable volatility and losses. Tariffs increase government revenue but are a cost to American businesses and consumers. No evidence suggests a court ruling on tariffs would provoke a 1929-scale economic collapse.

Opinion: Overstating cause-and-effect and invoking dramatic historical parallels confuses public understanding and diminishes trust in judicial and economic oversight.

TruthScore: 3/10

True: Tariff revenues have significantly increased and the market has hit record highs in 2024-25.

Hyperbole: Claims that tariffs are the primary or sole cause of market records, and that court intervention would make “recovery impossible,” as well as invoking a “GREAT DEPRESSION”.

Lies: No direct evidence supports the assertion that negative court rulings would precipitate 1929-style economic disaster.