Fact-Check Summary
The claim that “hundreds of thousands of people poured into our Country totally unvetted and unchecked” after the Afghanistan airlift is significantly exaggerated. Approximately 124,000 people were evacuated globally, with fewer than 77,000 paroled into the United States. Federal agencies conducted multi-layered screening, though multiple government reports identified gaps in vetting due to emergency conditions and incomplete data. Continuous identity vetting and re-screening saw some individuals identified on terrorism watchlists or facing criminal charges, but the overall process reflects both lapses and remedial oversight. The post’s depiction of the Biden administration’s intent omits that the withdrawal timeline originated with the previous administration and that the evacuation environment was shaped by an unexpected collapse of the Afghan government.
Belief Alignment Analysis
The post uses divisive, inflammatory language that undermines civil discourse and does not foster constructive engagement or respect for democratic norms. By labeling officials as “Crooked Joe Biden and his Thugs” and overstating figures, the post distorts the facts and appeals to emotion rather than evidence. Such rhetoric undermines public trust by misrepresenting the complexity of the Afghanistan evacuation and politicizing national security issues without acknowledgment of shared or bipartisan responsibility. This approach is inconsistent with values of truthfulness, civility, and inclusiveness in public debate.
Opinion
While it is valid to scrutinize government handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal, misrepresenting the numbers and fully dismissing the layered vetting—however imperfect—misleads the public and detracts from an informed policy debate. Broad, derogatory accusations toward political leadership further erode civic discourse. A fair assessment must acknowledge the real security concerns, the existence of vetting gaps, and the extraordinary pressures of the emergency, but should not amplify falsehoods or partisan labeling.
TLDR
The post overstates the scale of Afghan evacuee arrivals and mischaracterizes the vetting process. Serious vetting gaps did exist, but the claim of “totally unvetted and unchecked” entries is untrue. Inflammatory, partisan language in the post undermines accurate public understanding and responsible democratic discourse.
Claim: Hundreds of thousands of people poured into our country, totally unvetted and unchecked, because of Biden and his administration.
Fact: About 124,000 were evacuated from Afghanistan (not “hundreds of thousands”); fewer than 77,000 entered the U.S. Vetting was multi-layered and ongoing, with some gaps and later re-screening. Security risks were real but were managed after initial entry. The withdrawal timeline started under the previous administration.
Opinion: The post’s exaggeration of numbers and disregard of both the vetting efforts and the bipartisan origins/complexity of the withdrawal misleads readers and promotes division over informed discussion.
TruthScore: 3
True: Vetting gaps existed, and some evacuees were criminally charged or on watchlists. Emergency caused significant process difficulties.
Hyperbole: “Hundreds of thousands” (number was far lower); “totally unvetted and unchecked” ignores partial vetting and subsequent re-screening; use of “thugs” and extreme political labeling.
Lies: The claim that all arrivals were “totally unvetted and unchecked” is false. The scale described is not supported by data.