“Violence against people for political reasons has no place in America Todays shooting of a right wing activist for exercising his freedom of speech is reprehensible Social media Is all abuzz with right wingers angry devastated and outraged And rightly soThe left knows all about itthey experience targeted violent attacks and murders on a near constant basis And In those Instances It seems to be normalized by the right possibly even condoned as necessary for the common good Jan 6th wasnt a violent attack It was a day of love Charlottesville neoNazis who mowed down opposition protestors with a car were good people Historically targeted political terrorism is usually on the right directed at left leaning people and leaders Gabby Giffords was shot in the head and 18 others shot in 2011 Gretchen Whitmer had an attempted kidnapping and assassination in 2020 a lawmaker and her husband in Minnesota were brutally shot to death in their home and another one and their spouse shot 68 times each with a hit list of 80 targets all liberal leadersTrump refused to call Tim Walz offer condolences and not a single Republican leader condemned the attack Nancy Pelosis husband was attacked in their home Shapiros house was lit on fire a mob of thousands of Trump supporters descended on our nations capital to beat police officers and hang our Vice President Charleston church shooting in 2015 killing 9 African Americans Charlottesville rallies where a neoNazi rammed his car into counter demonstrators injuring 28 people and killing 1 with the president subsequently calling them good people Synagogue shooting in 2018 killing 11 Jews the 2020 murder of a Democratic judges son the mass shooting of immigrants at a Walmart in El Paso the mass shooting and murder of 10 black people by a white supremacist at a grocery store In Buffalo NY Not to mention the historical and frequent overuse of force by police resulting In the deaths of black people which seems to be endemic to our society The list of right wing extremist targeted violence against liberals goes on and on and onIf we want to go further back in history weve got the OKC bombing the beating of black people marching for the right to vote in Selma the KKK and all of its atrocities and lynchings of black people the assassination of MLK and all the way back to Slaveryit goes way back And a lot of it is rooted in racism and white supremacyTargeted right wing violence occurs all the time against left leaning figures Its something we just have to deal with because It Is constant and It never stops It happens one time to a right wing figure and all of a sudden the sky is falling and right wingers are having a meltdown about how out of control and dangerous the left is Of course It Is shocking sad and tragic It ALWAYS Is Theyve just never cared before because their side was the one doing it to a bunch of people they didnt really like anyway”

Fact-Check Summary

The post accurately references numerous incidents of political violence, including the recent shooting of Charlie Kirk, and various historical acts targeting public figures and marginalized communities. Most cited attacks (Gabby Giffords, Gretchen Whitmer plot, Charleston, Pittsburgh, El Paso, Buffalo, Oklahoma City) are factually reported, with correct general trends: research supports that right-wing extremist violence has historically resulted in more deadly acts in the U.S. Some claims employ hyperbolic language or oversimplify complex political responses, and a few details (such as specifics around the Minnesota lawmakers’ attack and mischaracterization of Trump’s Charlottesville remarks) are not fully supported. Overall, the post blends verified events with emotional, subjective framing and a few inaccuracies.

Belief Alignment Analysis

While the post rightly condemns violence against any individual for political reasons and draws attention to the dangers of escalating political hostility, its framing often fosters division by asserting broad motives, selective blame, and rhetorical contrasts between “the left” and “the right.” Assertions that violence by or against one side is normalized or ignored lack consistent, objective evidence and undermine inclusive, civil discourse. Certain hostile phrases and generalized attributions detract from constructive, fact-based engagement and risk inflaming polarization.

Opinion

The post’s factual foundation is strong when recounting specific violent incidents. However, its emotive and sweeping characterizations of political reactions and motives—often expressed without sufficient nuance—both overstate divisions and hamper productive, democratic dialogue. Careful attention to precision, civility, and shared values is warranted when discussing sensitive, consequential topics such as political violence.

TLDR

Most cited events of political violence and their general ideological patterns are accurate, but some claims are exaggerated, certain details are misstated, and the rhetoric risks undermining healthy, fact-driven civic discussion.

Claim: Political violence in America is overwhelmingly perpetrated by right-wing extremists against the left and marginalized groups, a reality that is ignored or condoned unless right-wing figures are targeted, provoking disproportionate outrage and distorted narratives.

Fact: The majority of cited incidents—including the Charlie Kirk shooting, various high-profile attacks, and historical patterns—are reported accurately and align with academic findings on extremist violence. Some specifics (e.g., number of gunshots in Minnesota, Trump’s precise Charlottesville comments) and assertions about political reactions are overstated or unverifiable.

Opinion: While the factual foundation is substantial, the post’s hyperbolic and divisive framing undermines civil engagement and distorts the discourse necessary for a free, fair, and inclusive democracy. Nuanced, balanced rhetoric strengthens rather than weakens democratic engagement.

TruthScore: 7

True: Accurate recounting of the majority of violent incidents, evidence-based trends of right-wing extremist violence, and legitimate condemnation of politically motivated attacks.

Hyperbole: Sweeping judgment of reaction patterns, blanket attributions of normalization or condoning by entire political factions, and overstated contrasts between “sides.”

Lies: Specific mischaracterization of Trump’s remarks in Charlottesville and unverified claim about 68 gunshots each in the Minnesota lawmakers’ attacks.